Thursday, February 28, 2019

BlackRock: the Mr. Fix-it of Wall Street

NEW YORK — One Saturday morning in March, Laurence Fink got some urgent news: Wall Street needed his help.
Fink runs BlackRock, a money management company whose name probably rings few bells outside financial circles. But on that March weekend the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, moving to defuse a crisis threatening the American financial system, began turning to BlackRock to play a crucial role in the government-brokered rescue of Bear Stearns, the faltering investment bank.
Now, under the aegis of the Fed, BlackRock is managing $30 billion of hard-to-sell assets from Bear Stearns, part of the central bank's unprecedented deal with JPMorgan Chase under which JPMorgan took control of the investment bank.
Fink, 55, is reluctant to talk about the assignment, and with good reason. If BlackRock fumbles, the Fed, and by extension American taxpayers, could lose billions.
In Washington, some question the arrangement, saying it puts taxpayers' money at too much risk. But on Wall Street, Fink's job for the Fed, along with other high-profile work, is quickly earning him a reputation as the Mr. Fix-it in the troubled credit markets. And for BlackRock, that means business - lots of it.

"We get called on all the time, but it's often not public," Fink said in an interview Monday in his glass-walled office in New York. BlackRock's prominence in the Bear Stearns deal was unusual. "This just happened to be more public because this was a much more dramatic episode," he said.
There is no shortage of drama these days in the credit markets, which happen to be Fink's specialty. Back in the 1980s, at First Boston, he helped pioneer mortgage securities, the kind of investments that are causing so much of the trouble now.
BlackRock's funds have largely dodged the blowup in the subprime mortgage market. So lately the firm has been counseling Florida about how its public investment fund, tainted by subprime investments, should ride out the storm. BlackRock also was among several Wall Street firms that advised the U.S. Treasury late last year on a controversial plan to shore up certain bank-affiliated investment vehicles (the initiative has since died).
Just this week, BlackRock agreed to manage risky subprime assets with a face value of $22 billion from UBS, the ailing Swiss bank. Fink has been crisscrossing the country to drum up even more business.
All this is helping to make Fink and his shareholders richer at a time that much of Wall Street is getting poorer. During the past year, as the shares of many larger, wealthier financial companies have plummeted, BlackRock's share price has soared 43 percent, closing at $212.15 Wednesday.
In the stock market, BlackRock, which Fink founded in a one-room office in 1988, is now worth about $25 billion, eclipsing the market capitalization of the venerable Lehman Brothers, which traces its history back to 1862. Fink made $26.4 million last year. But he also owns about 1.3 million BlackRock shares, a stake that is now worth $275 million.
Sitting in his office, Fink exudes the same restless energy as his traders, who hunch over computer terminals in concentric rings a few feet away. He folds his tall frame into his chair but cannot sit still. He twists this way and that, jumps up to offer a visitor chocolate candies with "BlackRock" emblazoned on the wrappers, and bellows to his assistant about his appointments.
"Most of the advancements of today are based on what we did more than 20 years ago," Fink said of his days at First Boston, where he earned the reputation as a whiz kid. But even now, two decades later, he still recalls how he ran up big losses at First Boston's bond division in 1986. That episode taught him a painful lesson, one he said Wall Street is now learning all over again: Risk management is crucial.
Fink has transformed his firm from a small bond shop into the largest publicly traded asset management company in the country. Along the way, the firm has focused ruthlessly on managing the risks it takes in the markets, BlackRock executives said.
That conservative approach appears to have paid off.
"We're paranoid and neurotic," Robert Kapito, BlackRock's president and a co-founder, said. "That's important in working with clients."
While many others on Wall Street are suffering, including BlackRock's biggest shareholder, Merrill Lynch, Fink's firm, which trades under the ticker symbol BLK, seems poised to prosper.



Individuals who need passports for imminent travel should contact IRS promptly to resolve tax debt

WASHINGTON ― The Internal Revenue Service today reiterated its warning that taxpayers may not be able to renew a current passport or obtain a new passport if they owe federal taxes. To avoid delays in travel plans, taxpayers need to take prompt action to resolve their tax issues.
In January of last year, the IRS began implementing new procedures affecting individuals with “seriously delinquent tax debts.” These new procedures implement provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. The law requires the IRS to notify the State Department of taxpayers the IRS has certified as owing a seriously delinquent tax debt, which is $52,000 or more. The law also requires State to deny their passport application or renewal. If a taxpayer currently has a valid passport, the State Department may revoke the passport or limit ability to travel outside the United States.
When the IRS certifies a taxpayer to the State Department as owing a seriously delinquent tax debt, they receive a Notice CP508C from the IRS. The notice explains what steps a taxpayer needs to take to resolve the debt. Please note, the IRS doesn’t send copies of the notice to powers of attorney. IRS telephone assistors can help taxpayers resolve the debt, for example, they can help taxpayers set up a payment plan or make them aware of other payment alternatives. Taxpayers shouldn’t delay because some resolutions take longer than others, such as adjusting a prior tax assessment.
When a taxpayer no longer has a seriously delinquent tax debt, because they paid it in full or made another payment arrangement, the IRS will reverse the taxpayer’s certification within thirty days. State will then remove the certification from the taxpayer’s record, so their passport won’t be at risk under this program. The IRS can expedite the decertification notice to the State Department for a taxpayer who resolves their debt, has a pending passport application and has imminent travel plans or lives abroad with an urgent need for a passport.
A taxpayer with a seriously delinquent tax debt is generally someone who owes the IRS more than $52,000 in back taxes, penalties and interest for which the IRS has filed a Notice of Federal Tax Lien and the period to challenge it has expired or the IRS has issued a levy.
Before denying a passport renewal or new passport application, the State Department will hold the taxpayer’s application for 90 days to allow them to:
  • Resolve any erroneous certification issues,
  • Make full payment of the tax debt, or
  • Enter a satisfactory payment arrangement with the IRS.

Ways to Resolve Tax Issues

There are several ways taxpayers can avoid having the IRS notify the State Department of their seriously delinquent tax debt. They include the following:
  • Paying the tax debt in full,
  • Paying the tax debt timely under an approved installment agreement,
  • Paying the tax debt timely under an accepted offer in compromise,
  • Paying the tax debt timely under the terms of a settlement agreement with the Department of Justice,
  • Having requested or have a pending collection due process appeal with a levy, or
  • Having collection suspended because a taxpayer has made an innocent spouse election or requested innocent spouse relief.

Relief programs for unpaid taxes

Frequently, taxpayers qualify for one of several relief programs including the following:
  • Payment agreement. Taxpayers can ask for a payment plan with the IRS by filing Form 9465. Taxpayers can download this form from IRS.gov and mail it along with a tax return, bill or notice. Some taxpayers can use the online payment agreementto set up a monthly payment agreement.
     
  • Offer in compromise. Some taxpayers may qualify for an offer in compromise, an agreement between a taxpayer and the IRS that settles the tax liability for less than the full amount owed. The IRS looks at the taxpayer’s income and assets to decide the taxpayer’s ability to pay. Taxpayers can use the Offer in Compromise Pre-Qualifier tool to help them decide whether they’re eligible for an offer in compromise.
Subject to change, the IRS also will not certify a taxpayer as owing a seriously delinquent tax debt or will reverse the certification for a taxpayer: 
  • Who is in bankruptcy,
  • Who is deceased,
  • Who is identified by the IRS as a victim of tax-related identity theft,
  • Whose account the IRS has determined is currently not collectible due to hardship,
  • Who is located within a federally declared disaster area,
  • Who has a request pending with the IRS for an installment agreement,
  • Who has a pending offer in compromise with the IRS, or
  • Who has an IRS accepted adjustment that will satisfy the debt in full.
For taxpayers serving in a combat zone who owe a seriously delinquent tax debt, the IRS postpones notifying the State Department of the delinquency and the taxpayer’s passport is not subject to denial during the time of service in a combat zone.
For more on these procedures and the law visit IRS.gov. The IRS first announced this matter in IRS news release IR-2018-7 on Jan. 16, 2018.




Wednesday, February 27, 2019

Beware the Ides of March — if you own a pass-through entity


Shakespeare’s words don’t apply just to Julius Caesar; they also apply to calendar-year partnerships, S corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) treated as partnerships or S corporations for tax purposes. Why? The Ides of March, more commonly known as March 15, is the federal income tax filing deadline for these “pass-through” entities.

Not-so-ancient history
Until the 2016 tax year, the filing deadline for partnerships was the same as that for individual taxpayers: April 15 (or shortly thereafter if April 15 fell on a weekend or holiday). One of the primary reasons for moving up the partnership filing deadline was to make it easier for owners to file their personal returns by the April filing deadline. After all, partnership (and S corporation) income passes through to the owners. The earlier date allows owners to use the information contained in the pass-through entity forms to file their personal returns.
For partnerships with fiscal year ends, tax returns are now due the 15th day of the third month after the close of the tax year. The same deadline applies to fiscal-year S corporations. Under prior law, returns for fiscal-year partnerships were due the 15th day of the fourth month after the close of the fiscal tax year.

Avoiding a tragedy
If you haven’t filed your calendar-year partnership or S corporation return yet and are worried about having sufficient time to complete it, you can avoid the tragedy of a late return by filing for an extension. Under the current law, the maximum extension for calendar-year partnerships is six months (until September 16, 2019, for 2018 returns). This is up from five months under the old law. So the extension deadline is the same — only the length of the extension has changed. The extension deadline for calendar-year S corporations also is September 16, 2019, for 2018 returns.
Whether you’ll be filing a partnership or an S corporation return, you must file for the extension by March 15 if it’s a calendar-year entity.

Extending the drama
Filing for an extension can be tax-smart if you’re missing critical documents or you face unexpected life events that prevent you from devoting sufficient time to your return right now.
But to avoid potential interest and penalties, you still must (with a few exceptions) pay any tax due by the unextended deadline. There probably won’t be any tax liability from the partnership or S corporation return. But, if filing for an extension for the entity return causes you to also have to file an extension for your personal return, it could cause you to owe interest and penalties in relation to your personal return.
We can help you file your tax returns on a timely basis or determine whether filing for an extension is appropriate. Contact us today.
© 2019








Hedge funds bet cautiously on even higher oil prices: Kemp

 LONDON (Reuters) - (John Kemp is a Reuters market analyst. The views expressed are his own.)


Hedge funds added more bullish positions in crude and fuels in the most recent week in the expectation that positive trade talks between the United States and China would keep the global economy expanding.
Saudi Arabia’s substantial output cuts and U.S. sanctions on Iran and Venezuela also are restricting crude supplies and helping eliminate a previously expected surplus in the market in 2019.
Hedge funds and other money managers were net buyers of Brent crude futures and options equivalent to 9 million barrels in the week to Feb. 19, data from ICE Futures Europe showed.
Portfolio managers have been net buyers of Brent in 10 of the last 11 weeks, increasing their overall bullish position by a total of 139 million barrels since Dec. 4.
But funds have become only moderately bullish on crude, with long positions outnumbering short ones by a ratio of less than 6:1 compared with as much as 12:1 or even 20:1 at times between 2016 and 2018.
Fund managers were also net buyers of another 10 million barrels of European gasoil futures and options in the week to Feb. 19, for the seventh week running, buying a total of 49 million barrels since the end of 2018.
As with crude, however, investors have become moderately bullish on the outlook for middle distillates such as gasoil, diesel and jet fuel.
Funds hold seven bullish long positions for every bearish short one, up from a ratio of 1:1 at the turn of the year but still far below the 31:1 ratio at the start of October.
The relatively cautious positioning in both crude and fuels likely reflects substantial uncertainty about the economic outlook for the rest of the year and into 2020.
Stocks rally on trade hopes
Trade negotiations between the United States and China appear to be making progress and the deadline for additional tariffs has been pushed back.
But global growth has slowed significantly and there is no guarantee a successful outcome to the trade negotiations will be enough, on its own, to reinvigorate flagging economic activity.

As oil prices rise toward $70 and above, there is also an increasing probability shale production will accelerate again in the United States, or of renewed political pressure from the White House on Saudi Arabia, capping the price rally.

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Goldman Sachs Sees Oil Taking a Fleeting Trip to $70-$75 a Barrel

Oil prices could potentially rise as much as 13 percent from current levels, though the rally may prove fleeting, according to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

Top OPEC member Saudi Arabia is cutting output faster than U.S. shale drillers can fill the gap, leaving a void in the market that may push global benchmark Brent crude to $70-$75 a barrel in the near future, bank analysts led by Jeffrey Currie said in a note. At the same time, supply disruptions in Venezuela are likely to accelerate in coming months, they wrote.

"The oil market will likely continue to tighten significantly this March and April,” Currie said. “While prices could easily trade in a $70-$75 a barrel trading range, we believe such an environment would likely prove fleeting,” he said, reaffirming Goldman’s forecast for Brent to end the year at $60.

Brent has rallied 23 percent this year after a collapse of 35 percent in the last quarter of 2018 as the Saudis spearheaded a plan by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies to curb production. Signs the U.S. and China are moving closer to a trade deal have improved the demand outlook, with President Donald Trump saying over the weekend he’ll extend a deadline to raise tariffs on Chinese goods.


Saudi Arabia is guiding to March production around 500,000 barrels a day lower than its own quota, Currie said in the Feb. 25 note. At least 100,000 barrels a day of Venezuelan exports have been lost, and this could rise to a daily 200,000 to 300,000 barrels in coming months if there’s no political resolution.free article limit.
Subscribe now to get unlimited access.




Monday, February 25, 2019

Taxpayers turning to accountants to help navigate new tax law

Consumers are confused this year about how the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will affect them and are asking tax professionals for assistance with their taxes, according to a new survey.
The survey, by the personal financial management platform Nummo, polled 2,000 consumers about their taxes. Amid reports that tax refunds are down this year, 70 percent of the respondents said they expect a refund, but more than one-third said they don’t know how much they will receive.
What a crazy filing season it will be, as it is the first-time filing returns after Congress passed the largest reform to the tax code in over 30  years.  Of course, this makes tax preparers happy as the level of complication in preparing and planning has gone up.  While there are tax breaks and reduced rates for all filers, the lion’s share of the windfall will go to the very richest folks in America. Below are some of the key changes, take a look and see how you stack up.  Reach out with any questions you have BEFORE actually working with your advisor to complete your filing.  January is a great time to do this as the season has not ramped up to the point where CPAs and tax preparers are crazy busy.
1)   The new rates are slightly lower than the old rates almost across the board, but the bill contains the same seven brackets that existed prior to reform.   The new thresholds for taxation are different as well which will complicate some planning for those going at it on their own.
2)   When comparing the standard deduction vs. itemizing deductions, 2018 will offer some big changes.  The standard, government given deduction nearly doubles for 2018. Single filers go from a standard deduction of $6,350 to $12,000.  Married filers go from $12,700 to $24,000!  This will mean many taxpayers will not itemize their deductions on their returns for 2018.  This could have negative impact on the real estate market, as individuals or families hunting for lower priced homes will no longer be able to save on their taxes from buying the home.  Couple this with rising interest rates and the real estate lobby is sure to have some concern.
3)   For those who will still itemize, the major difference is the $10,000 cap on all taxes paid on Schedule A.  When adding up state taxes, real estate taxes, and local property taxes the most that can be taken as a write-off on 2018 returns is $10,000.  This is sure to affect many higher income taxpayers and residents of the wealthier states who will now have their tax deduction trimmed significantly.
4)   With reform bring changes to health care, the biggest change being the elimination of the health care penalty for not having insurance.  This is sure to help individuals and families many who are just trying to get by.  The limit for deducting medical expenses has dropped from 10% of AGI to 7.5% so more folks will be able to write off medical expenses on their 2018 returns all things being equal.
5)   For those lucky enough to make enough money to obtain a mortgage as high as $750,000, that is the most balance you can use to write off mortgage interest on 2018 returns, down from 1 million maximum loan.
6)   Charitable deductions are an interesting part of reform. The most you can give to qualified charities has increased from 50% to 60% of adjusted gross income.  I cannot imagine this affects anyone making less than millions of dollars as most of us don’t give ½ of our money away anyway. Gifting appreciated stock or real estate to charitable organizations is still allowed under the new law and is an amazing strategy to minimize capital gains taxes.  This too will help the very top earners primarily.
7)   There is no longer any deduction for the personal exemption.  This will affect all returns, but the higher income filers already had this exemption limited in many cases for prior filing seasons.
8)   Credits have been expanded, and this is one area where the lower and middle income will benefit a lot.  Tax credits for children will double from $1,000 to $2,000, and there is a new $500 credit for dependents who are not children.  The phase out has been increased from $110,000 for a married couple to $400,000, which is sure to make more upper income folks happy with the extra cash.
9)   One change that taxpayers may not feel but will slowly but surely affect their bottom line is the new way the tax brackets are adjusted for inflation.  Previously the brackets were adjusted using the Consumer Price Index, and the new method to be used will be the chained CPI, which makes inflation appear lower pushing more Americans into higher brackets without them knowing it. According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, this will add more than $134 billion to the federal coffers over the next decade, all from individual taxpayers, not corporations, which are most definitely not people.
10) Last but not least:  Business owners may be eligible for huge breaks.  First, the top corporate rate was slashed from 35% to 21%, in the hope that the corporations would hire more people and raise wages.  Well, that did not happen, as rich business owners won’t hire or add to their inventory unless they have buyers for their products or service.  What they did do with the huge break was to buy back their own company stock at levels never seen before.  Over 1 trillion dollars, not in the hands of working Americans https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/18/stock-buybacks-hit-a-record-1point1-trillion-and-the-years-not-over.html .  There is a new 20% deduction from income for certain type of “pass-through” entities such as partnerships, S Corps, and sole proprietorships.  Be sure to check with your advisor as there are income limitations as well as limits on who can write off the deduction.
There are certainly more changes which occur on a case by case basis.  Good luck filing this year please stay ahead of your filing whenever possible.

Friday, February 22, 2019

US, China agree to 90-day truce to hash out trade differences

The U.S. and China have agreed to a 90-day truce in a bid to work out their trade differences. The news came Saturday following a dinner meeting between President Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping at the Group of 20 summit in Buenos Aires.
As part of the detente, Trump agreed to delay plans to raise tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods that would have taken effect Jan. 1. China agreed to buy a “substantial amount” of agricultural, energy and industrial products from the U.S. to reduce the trade deficit.
"It's an incredible deal," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, on his way back to Washington. "What I'll be doing is holding back on tariffs. China will be opening up, China will be getting rid of tariffs. China will be buying massive amounts of products from us." The temporary agreement will give both nations time to iron out their differences. If not, the $200 billion in planned tariffs will go into effect.
Trump has already imposed tariffs on $250 billion on Chinese products. In response, China slapped taxes on $110 billion in American goods.
The meeting came during Trump’s weekend trip to Argentina where he canceled a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin amid tensions between Russia and Ukraine. He also canceled a Saturday news conference following the death of former President George H.W. Bush.
"It's great the two sides took advantage of this opportunity to call a truce," said Andy Rothman, investment strategist at Matthews Asia. "The two sides appear to have had a major change of heart to move away from confrontation toward engagement. This changes the tone and direction of the bilateral conversation."
China also conceded to label fentanyl, the synthetic opioid cited in thousands of drug deaths, as a controlled substance and agreed to reconsider a takeover by U.S. chipmaker Qualcomm that it had previously blocked.
China nixed the proposed purchase of Dutch semiconductor manufacturer NXP by the chipmaker over antitrust concerns.
White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said China's decision to label the drug as a controlled substance means that "people selling fentanyl to the United States will be subject to China's maximum penalty under the law."
The U.S. has pressured China to take a tougher stance against the drug, which is 50 times more powerful than heroin. Most of the U.S. supply of the drug is made in China.
Washington has also accused Beijing of selling trade secrets and forcing American companies to hand over technology in exchange for access to Chinese markets.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Hedge Funds, After A Record Short Position, Could Boost The Gold Rally

Gold's rally could have further to run if hedge fund managers ramp up bullish bets after last year's extended big short.


The metal soared to a 10-month high of $1,346.80 an ounce on Wednesday as a mounting chorus warns of an imminent slowdown in global growth. Yet the fast money has largely missed this uptrend.
On the heels of their record short, money managers remain only modestly allocated to the metal, according to futures positioning data from the end of January, delayed by the recent U.S. government shutdown.
"Despite a more positive attitude, investors have not piled into gold, aggressively chasing the market," Joni Teves, a strategist at UBS Group AG wrote in a note. "Reluctance lingers, and the risk is that with many market participants waiting to buy dips, there could be a lot of catching up to do if positive catalysts extend."

Societe Generale: Buy Gold And The Gold Mining Stocks

Heavyweight commodity analysts like those at Societe Generale SA have recommended buying both gold and miners this year, saying the metal should "break free" in 2019 amid a scarcity of havens. A dovish Federal Reserve and central-bank buying are also providing bulls with fodder.
Last year the bears ran wild, as hedge funds and other large speculators built up the biggest-ever net-short position in gold futures and options, according to U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission figures going back to 2006. They were betting that gold would remain under pressure as investors favored the dollar as a haven asset during the U.S.-China trade war.
Not everyone believes the fast money has a reason to go all-in just yet.
"You get a reverse snowball effect in gold rallies; the higher it goes, the more it attracts fund money," said David Govett, head of precious metals trading at Marex Spectron Group in London. "But overall, the stock market is firm, and I doubt the dollar comes back that much more, so I think the upside is limited on this move."



Thursday, February 21, 2019

Watchdog exposes Pentagon's cyber struggles

Defense experts are seizing on a stunning federal report highlighting cyber vulnerabilities in U.S. weapons systems, calling it an embarrassing wake-up call for the Pentagon.
A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report released this week found that nearly all of the weapons systems it tested had extensive cyber flaws. The report warned that the Department of Defense (DOD) “likely has an entire generation of systems that were designed and built without adequately considering cybersecurity.”
Experts said the alarming report was shining a light on the Pentagon's systematic failure to consider cyber threats in building the country's most powerful weapons.
“Military members’ lives could depend on the weapon system working as it's supposed to,” said Bob Taylor, former Pentagon acting general counsel during the Obama administration. “But if it contains a vulnerability that could be triggered by an adversary, it may not carry out a function that you’re counting on it having.
"And that could be a matter of life and death,” he added.
The report contains a number of startling examples of how hackers are able to penetrate weapons systems.
Testers were able to disrupt systems, change and download data. They also found that they could shut down parts of a system by simply scanning for cyber flaws. In one case, they were able to entirely take over a weapons system in just one day. One team of hackers was even able to send a message asking that users insert at least two quarters in order to continue using a system.
But the report was most damning over the Pentagon's consideration of cybersecurity in the systems themselves, finding that the department was still "in the early stage of trying to understand how to apply cybersecurity to weapon systems.”
Maj. Audricia M. Harris, a Pentagon spokesperson, said in a statement to The Hill that the department “takes threats to our nation seriously.”
“We are continuously strengthening our defensive posture through network hardening, improved cybersecurity, and working with our international allies and partners and our Defense Industrial Base and Defense Critical Infrastructure partners to secure critical information,” she said.
Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee and co-founder of the Congressional Cybersecurity Caucus, said he was “not surprised” by the report's findings.
“While DoD has made progress in lowering its cybersecurity risks, it has not moved fast enough,” he said in a statement.
Lawmakers have long pressured the military to seriously address its cyber flaws.
A defense authorization bill for fiscal 2016 required the Pentagon to test for cyber weaknesses in weapon systems and create plans to mitigate cyber attacks.
This year's defense authorization bill went further, mandating that the department detail a budget for their cybersecurity efforts.
The Pentagon has stepped up its efforts to address cyber in recent years.
For example, U.S. Cyber Command was elevated last year to be a standalone agency, instead of being housed within the NSA. And contractors with the department that handle unclassified data were required to implement certain cybersecurity standards by the start of 2018 or risk losing the contracts.
Still, the GAO report found that defense officials believed the security measures they had implemented were enough to defeat hackers, even though teams were able to penetrate systems.
Military leaders publicly acknowledged at a Senate hearing last month that the Pentagon struggles with recruiting staffers to work on cyber issues. Lt. Gen. Stephen G. Fogarty, the commander of U.S. Army Cyber Command, told lawmakers the division has “a challenge in retaining the core skills that we need.”
Edgard Capdevielle, CEO of industrial cybersecurity firm Nozomi Networks, said that the report highlighted the scope of the Pentagon's problems. Capdevielle said it's “not entirely surprising that military leaders turned a blind eye to security weaknesses within the Pentagon’s multibillion-dollar weapons systems.”
“Addressing cybersecurity vulnerabilities after the fact is a monumental task, so it’s unfortunate that the military failed to take action despite continued warnings from the Government Accountability Office,” he said.
John Harmon, a former NSA analyst and vice president of sales for cyber firm Endgame, said many Pentagon officials are focused on getting weapons systems to comply with necessary regulations so they can go into service. But that means that longterm thinking about cyber threats takes a back seat.
He also noted that cyber standards must constantly be updated. Some systems, like ships, are built to last for decades.
“Compliance is not security, it’s compliance,” Harmon said.
“Some of these systems again were built a long time ago. And sure, they might be compliant with when they were put out, but they’re not up to date when it comes to there being some kind of a system that actually protects these things from some kind of sophisticated adversary.”
Defense watchers said improving the Pentagon's cyber health would need a change in culture.
Taylor, now a senior counsel for the law firm Hogan Lovells, said military leaders need to send a stronger message to Pentagon officials about adopting good cybersecurity practices and better recognizing risks.
“I think that there really needs to be a strong message the people will be held accountable for not adequately responding to the shortcomings that have been revealed, and to create a culture of real care and attention to the vulnerabilities that the network weapons systems create,” he said.